Legal Opinion

In Re Fox

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1993No. 92-SP-226, 92-SP-1094PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

On December 18, 1992, in a Report and Recommendation which is attached to this opinion and made a part hereof, the Board on Professional Responsibility recommended that respondent H. Lawrence Fox, who has been convicted of crimes of moral turpitude within the meaning of D.C.Code § ll-2503(a) (1989), be disbarred. Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel has filed exceptions to the report. See D.C.Bar Rule XI, § 9(e). Accordingly, for the reasons stated by the Board, respondent H. Lawrence Fox is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia.

So ordered. 1

District of Columbia…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of ColsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Matter of BondDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In Re KrowenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re ApplerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re BereanoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. In re ReggieDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API