Legal Opinion

Nhep v. Roisen

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 10, 1989No. C7-89-296Published

1Opinion of the Court

446 N.W.2d 425 (1989)

Sophal NHEP, Appellant,

v.

Diane Marie ROISEN, Respondent.

No. C7-89-296.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 10, 1989.

Review Denied December 1, 1989.

Jeff Gray, Lange & Megarry, P.A., Bloomington, for appellant.

William M. Hart, Kenneth W. Dodge, Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by SHORT, P.J., and FOLEY and LOMMEN[*], JJ.

OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

This action is the result of an automobile accident in which respondent Diane Marie Roisen rear-ended a car driven by appellant Sophal Nhep.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Minnesota-Iowa Television Co. v. Watonwan T v. Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API