Legal Opinion

Brigham v. Duany

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment of foreclosure in favor of plaintiffs -and against the defendant, owners, reversed on reargument, on the law and the facts, upon' the ground that the lien is defective in that it fails to contain a statement of the agreed price or value of the labor and materials, a statement of the full amount of the contract and extra work, and the agreed price and value thereof, or a statement of the whole value of the labor performed and materials furnished. (Toop v. Smith, 181 N. Y. 283; Flaum v. Picarreto, 226 id. 468.) Plaintiffs were entitled to personal judgment against *870the defendant owners…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Wall Paper Co. v. . SireNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Prime v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947
  2. In re 12 East Eighty-Sixth Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Nelson v. SchrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API