Legal Opinion

Atkins v. Jiminy Peak, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 5, 1987PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

This case presents the question whether an action by an injured skier against a ski area operator is governed by the one-year limitation of actions provision of G. L. c. 143, § 7 IP, where the plaintiff’s theories of recovery are negligence and breach of warranty, as well as breach of contract, in the renting of defective ski equipment.

In her original complaint, filed on December 5, 1984, the plaintiff alleged that on March 20, 1982, she sustained serious injuries while skiing at the defendant’s ski resort, and that those injuries were caused by defective ski equipment she had rented from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Grass v. Catamount Development Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McHerron v. Jiminy Peak, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  2. Tilley v. Brodie Mountain Ski Area, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Wolfson v. GlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. McHerron v. Jiminy Peak, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  5. Burden ex rel. Burden v. Amesbury Sports Park, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API