State ex inf. Barker v. Armour Packing Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
Quo Warranto. (1) The information in this cause is sufficient and specifically charges facts which show, if true, that respondents have violated the antitrust statutes of this State. There is no misjoinder of parties respondent. State ex inf. v. Railroad, 240 Mo. 35; State ex rel. v. Grimm, 220 Mo. 483; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. 1; Sec. 10310, R. S. 1909. (2) This action is not barred by tbe Statutes of Limitation.
Read the full summary
Quo Warranto. (1) The information in this cause is sufficient and specifically charges facts which show, if true, that respondents have violated the antitrust statutes of this State. There is no misjoinder of parties respondent. State ex inf. v. Railroad, 240 Mo. 35; State ex rel. v. Grimm, 220 Mo. 483; State ex inf. v. Standard Oil Co., 218 Mo. 1; Sec. 10310, R. S. 1909. (2) This action is not barred by tbe Statutes of Limitation. In this State we have no Statute of Limitations against the State instituting suits by tbe Attorney-General by information, in tbe nature of quo ivarranto, such as…
1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.
In June, 1910, the State of Missouri, u.pon the information of the Attorney-General, instituted a proceeding in quo warranto in the Supreme Court against the Hammond Packing Company, an Illinois corporation doing business under the authority of the laws of this State, at St. Joseph, Missouri, and the St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Company, a Missouri corporation engaged in business at the city of St. Louis.
On the same date a like proceeding was commenced in this court by the Attorney-General against the Armour Packing Company, a corporation organized unT der the laws of the State of New…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- People v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
- State Ex Inf. Miller v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. McKittrick v. American Colony InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Dietrich v. Cape Brewery & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
- State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. WileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.