Legal Opinion

Longworth v. Taylor

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio

Decided December 15, 1838PublishedCited by 10 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by Nicholas Long-worth against James Taylor for a specific performance of a contract made for the sale of a lot of ground in the city of Cincinnati.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT.

This court delivered an opinion in this case at December term, 1829; but on account of a change in one of the members of the court, and a wish expressed by the counsel of the defendant, for a re-argument of the case, the court directed it to be re-argued. The controversy arises on a 'contract made the 5th of April, 1814, in which the plaintiff purchased from the defendant part of lot 81, in Cincinnati, at one hundred and twenty-five dollars per foot; one-third of the purchase money to be paid down, one-third in six, and the other in twelve months. The defendant to execute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brashier v. GratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Benedict v. LynchNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Love v. WatkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Gentry v. RogersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1867
  3. Asia v. HiserSupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  4. Standard Lumber Co. v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Evans v. LeeNevada Supreme Court · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API