Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 1, 2000No. 2D99-4519PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

768 So.2d 513 (2000)

Errol D. BROOKS, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D99-4519.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 1, 2000.

2Per curiam

Errol D. Brooks appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). Brooks asserts that his sentences in case numbers 91-3635 and 91-3539 are illegal because the trial court failed to orally pronounce his sentences as a habitual offender and, therefore, the written sentence fails to comport to the oral pronouncement at sentencing. We affirm in part as to…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dawson/Knapp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Brooks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Finney v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  5. Richardson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API