Legal Opinion

Keith Dunham Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 5, 1938No. 4178PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJacKSON, Judge

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Customs Court which overruled the claims of the protests of appellant and held the imported devices invoiced as “oxygen jet hand cutting machines,” or “secators” and parts thereof, to' be properly assessed for duty by the collector under paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, at 35 per centum ad valorem. The opinion below held the merchandise to be portable tools, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, and not dutiable, as claimed by the appellant, under paragraph 372 of the said act at 30 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. United States v. Janson Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. United States v. Anderson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EOS of North America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API