Legal Opinion

ACM Partnership v. Commissioner IRS (Part II)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 13, 1998No. 97-7484, 97-7527UnknownCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant ACM Partnership (“ACM”), through its tax matters partner Southampton-Hamilton Company (“Southampton”), appeals from a decision of the United States Tax Court dated June 12, 1997. The Tax Court’s jurisdiction rested on I.R.C. §§ 7442, 6213 and 6226 based on appellant’s timely filing of a petition seeking redetermination of a deficiency and review of a Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment. Appellate jurisdiction rests on I.R.C. § 7482(a)(1). Venue is proper pursuant to I.R.C. § 7482(b)(1)(A) as Southampton maintained…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Acm Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner, in No. 97-7484 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Acm Partnership, Southampton-Hamilton Company, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, in No. 97-7527Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API