ACM Partnership v. Commissioner IRS (Part II)
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant ACM Partnership (“ACM”), through its tax matters partner Southampton-Hamilton Company (“Southampton”), appeals from a decision of the United States Tax Court dated June 12, 1997. The Tax Court’s jurisdiction rested on I.R.C. §§ 7442, 6213 and 6226 based on appellant’s timely filing of a petition seeking redetermination of a deficiency and review of a Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment. Appellate jurisdiction rests on I.R.C. § 7482(a)(1). Venue is proper pursuant to I.R.C. § 7482(b)(1)(A) as Southampton maintained…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Knetsch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.