Legal Opinion

Fogarty v. Shamokin & Mount Carmel Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1951No. Appeal, No. 92PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Ladner,

This is an appeal by the defendant (the judgment debtor) and garnishee, from a judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff appellee against the garnishee pursuant to its answers to interrogatories. We adopt a portion of the facts as stated by the learned court below so far as they relate to this appeal.

“The plaintiff, Frank J. Fogarty, caused an attachment execution sur judgment to issue out of this Court on March 2, 1950, against the defendant, Shamokin and Mount Carmel Transit Company, with directions to Sheriff to attach all and singular the goods and chattels,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bulger v. Wilderman and PleetSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Randal v. Jersey Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co. v. HenshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Frey v. U. T. Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Miners Savings Bank v. ThomasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commerce Bank Harris Savings Association v. Mountain View Village, Inc. Property Management, Inc., Mountain View Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  2. Landau v. Western Pennsylvania National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. In Re TM Carlton House Partners, Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. LANDAU v. W. PA. NAT. BANKSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. J.H. Streiker & Co. v. SeSide Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API