Legal Opinion

Huntzinger v. Wileman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1945No. Appeal 163PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M., Stearns,. This was originally an action in equity, to set aside a written agreement and restore possession of real estate held by defendants under the agreement which plaintiff, the record owner, alleges was secured., by defendants’, fraud and duress. ,

Plaintiff, then a sickly woman of 70 years,, became a widow five months before the execution of the agreement in question. The husband and wife had resided in the real estate. They had no children. , Plaintiff desired the services of individuals to look after her ápd the home. She advertised for a man and wife…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KallenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Koch v. ImhofSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Yago v. PipicelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Reeves v. Philadelphia Gas Works Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Pantall v. Rochester & Pittsburg Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. v. ChristSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. FoerstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. The City of Clairton, PA v. ZHB of the City of Clairton, PA, & Cornerstone Residence, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API