Huntzinger v. Wileman
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Allen M., Stearns,. This was originally an action in equity, to set aside a written agreement and restore possession of real estate held by defendants under the agreement which plaintiff, the record owner, alleges was secured., by defendants’, fraud and duress. ,
Plaintiff, then a sickly woman of 70 years,, became a widow five months before the execution of the agreement in question. The husband and wife had resided in the real estate. They had no children. , Plaintiff desired the services of individuals to look after her ápd the home. She advertised for a man and wife…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wilson v. KallenbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Koch v. ImhofSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Yago v. PipicelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Reeves v. Philadelphia Gas Works Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Pantall v. Rochester & Pittsburg Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Peoples First National Bank & Trust Co. v. ChristSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. FoerstSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- The City of Clairton, PA v. ZHB of the City of Clairton, PA, & Cornerstone Residence, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021