Legal Opinion

Stritt v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1978No. WCB No. 77-3622, CA 11884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund appeals from the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the Opinion and Order of the referee holding that claimant’s moving expenses incurred pursuant to a doctor’s recommendation were compensable.

The record discloses that claimant, a chip-truck driver in the Coos Bay, Oregon area, suffered from a compensable work-related allergic dermatitis caused by wood products. One of the documents indicates that claimant’s physician, Dr. Maeyens, "did in fact recommend to Mr. Stritt that he relocate to a more suitable environment.” An allergist recommended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holden v. Willamette Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  2. Claim of Clark v. Fedders-Quigan Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Kinney v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Levenson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Compensation of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Hoffart v. FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API