Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided April 5, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Barbara Horn State Representative P.O. Box 64 Foreman, Arkansas 71836-0064

Dear Representative Horn:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on the following question:

Under provision of Arkansas Code Annotated 6-20-402(a)(3), is `purchase of equipment' a purpose for which a school board may enter into a three-year installment contract to finance the purchase of a district road vehicle; or, is such an obligation to be charged against the district revenues of the fiscal year in which the obligation is incurred?

It is my opinion that a road vehicle can fall under the term…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ragland v. DumasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Prime Business Co. v. DrinkwaterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1966
  3. Dependent School District No. 13 v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API