Legal Opinion

Rice v. Village of Danville

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1930No. 303PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMERT, PJ.

The record discloses that the amount assessed against the property owners w,as less than the amount that could have been lawfully assessed against them, assuming that they were benefitted to that degree.

Section 3896 GC provides for the items of cost which may be included and contains the phrase, “any other necessary expenditure.”

Plaintiff’s chief contention seems to be and stress is made upon the subject of the question of exceeding the benefits conferred upon the property. We do not believe that- the term “benefits” means simply an advance or increase in market values, but they…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burton v. City of MiddletownOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Arvidson v. Board of County CommissionersAshtabula County Court of Common Pleas · 1971
  3. Limpert v. DayCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1966
  4. Louisville Memorial Gardens, Inc. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API