Legal Opinion

Horowitz v. Marel Electrical Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated May 19, 1999, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

*573The defendant Marel Electrical Services, Inc. (hereinafter Marel), made a prima facie showing that it was not at fault in the happening of the plaintiffs accident. The plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact that Marel failed to install an electrical conduit in accordance with her employer’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ryan v. Feeney & Sheehan Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Morriseau v. Rifenburg Construction, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Long v. John W. Danforth Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gee v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. Peluso v. ERMAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Fernandez v. 707, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Lacy v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Shindler v. WarfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API