Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Morris

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1996No. CV-95-0447-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARTONE, Justice.

We are asked to resolve a conflict between Division One and Division Two of the Court of Appeals over whether the expansion of the definition of forcible detainer in A.R.S. § 12-1173.01 to include transactions in which property is sold means that the merits of title may now be tried in an action for forcible detainer, notwithstanding the contrary provision of A.R.S. § 12-1177(A). We agree with Division One that § 12-1173.01 has no such effect and that the prohibition against inquiring into the merits of title under § 12-1177(A) in a forcible detainer action is alive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andreola v. Arizona BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  2. Curtis v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Sandoval v. RyanColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Moreno v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. Mason v. CansinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. Bank of Ny v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Lovett v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. Secure Ventures v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API