Curtis v. Morris
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARTONE, Justice.
We are asked to resolve a conflict between Division One and Division Two of the Court of Appeals over whether the expansion of the definition of forcible detainer in A.R.S. § 12-1173.01 to include transactions in which property is sold means that the merits of title may now be tried in an action for forcible detainer, notwithstanding the contrary provision of A.R.S. § 12-1177(A). We agree with Division One that § 12-1173.01 has no such effect and that the prohibition against inquiring into the merits of title under § 12-1177(A) in a forcible detainer action is alive…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Andreola v. Arizona BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Curtis v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Sandoval v. RyanColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
- Moreno v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carrington Mortgage Services LLC v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Mason v. CansinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Bank of Ny v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Lovett v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Secure Ventures v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.