Legal Opinion

Priest v. Hodges

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 5, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Lonoke Circuit Court; Eugene Lankford, Judge;

1Opinion of the CourtFrauenthall, J.

This is a replevin suit, which was instituted by the plaintiff, W. R. Priest, against the defendant, E. R. Hodges, for the recovery of the possession of a mule The plaintiff claimed the property by virtue of a mortgage' which had been executed to him by one W. I. Rainey, to secure the payment of a note for $40 and interest. The defendant claimed to be the owner of the property by purchase from partie'i who had obtained it from said mortgagor; and upon his motion W. I. Rainey was made a party defendant to the suit. The defendants admitted the execution and validity of the mortgage and note,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Ketchum v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Shaul v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  4. Chamblee v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1876
  5. Lynch v. DaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lowe v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Emerson v. Stevens Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Rhynas v. KeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. McDermott v. Kimball Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Guion Mercantile Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API