Legal Opinion

(PC) Rodgers-Castillo v. Allen

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 17, 2025No. 1:25-cv-00304Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MILTON RODGERS-CASTILLO, et al. Case No. 1:25-cv-00304-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF MANUEL RODGERS-CASTILLO TO SUBMIT 13 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE 14 ALLEN, et al., THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Milton Rodgers-Castillo and Manuel Rodgers-Castillo (“Plaintiffs”) are state 18 prisoners proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiffs initiated this joint action on March 12, 2025.1 (ECF No. 1.)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Topaz Johnson v. HdspCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API