Legal Opinion

People v. Hewitt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 22, 2011PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1120The defendant’s contention that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him is without merit. The evidence at the suppression hearing established that at the time they took the defendant into custody, the police had probable cause to arrest the defendant based on information provided by identifiable citizens that he had committed a crime (see People v Maldonado, 86 NY2d 631, 635 [1995]; People v Cooper, 38 AD3d 678, 679 [2007]; People v Cotton, 143 AD2d 680 [1988]).

The defendant’s contention that the photo array from which the complainant selected his picture was unduly suggestive is…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. BarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  2. People v. JimenezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. People v. ShamsiddeenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. People v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API