Legal Opinion
Baumrind v. Fidelman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 21, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order, Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, entered August 9, 1991, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, New York County (Mark H. Spires, J.), entered February 28, 1991, granting respondent’s motion to dismiss this holdover proceeding, affirmed, without costs.
Administrative Code of the City of New York § 27-2009.1 (b) (formerly § D26-10.10) requires that a no-pet clause in a lease be enforced through a proceeding commenced within three months after the tenant begins openly and notoriously keeping the pet. Here, a proceeding was commenced within such three-month period,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zappone v. Home InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Brown v. JohnsonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Board of Managers v. LamontaneroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gold Queens, LLC v. CohenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013
- Bray Realty, LLC v. PilajAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
- Seward Park Housing Corp. v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001