Legal Opinion

Whitham v. Hilton

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1914No. 11599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered May 24, 1913, in an action for services rendered, after a trial to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff seeks recovery of compensation for services rendered by him for the defendant, alleging the same to be of the reasonable value of $350. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $181.25. From this disposition of the cause, the defendant appealed, and thereafter the plaintiff also appealed.

While the evidence is not free from conflict, we think the controlling facts established thereby may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff is a duly admitted and practicing attorney and counsellor at law, residing at Seattle, in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Broderius v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Buchanan v. SchubachWashington Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API