Lessee of Sheldon v. Coates
Ohio Supreme Court
This is an action of ejectment from the county'of Cuyahoga. A verdict was taken for the defendant, and the plaintiff moved for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
The land in controversy is a part of lot No. 138, township No. 6, in the 11th range, in the Connecticut Western Reserve. On the trial there was no contest as to the right of the plaintiff to recover, unless the proceedings under a certain sale for taxes, in 1806, were valid; but if such tax sale was sustainable, the title of the defendant was unquestioned. To support this sale several documents were offered in evidence by the defendant’s counsel, which wore objected to by the counsel for the plaintiff, but admitted by the court to go to the jury, and the reasons stated in the motion for a new…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- R & H Trucking, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Cas. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Titus v. CorkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Olbrich v. Shelby Mutual InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Zappitelli v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.