Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bryant v. Akron Metropolitan Park District

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1929No. 21324 and 21336PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.

These two error proceedings, filed in this court as of right, involve the same or similar questions of constitutional law, and have therefore been argued together and will be disposed of in one opinion. Each was begun as a taxpayer’s suit, attacking the constitutionality of the Park District Act, General Code Sections 2976-1 to 2976-10c, inclusive (107 O. L., 65-69), and the amendments thereto, Sections 2976-1 and 2976-7, and the supplemental Sections 2976-10d to 2976-lOi (108 O. L., pt. 2, 1097-1100). Incidentally, the litigation in each instance involves questions of the lawful existence of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. CovingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Hill v. HigdonOhio Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Cline v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Parker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
  5. Trustees of the Presbyterian Church v. ChulipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Chambers v. St. Mary's SchoolOhio Supreme Court · 1998

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API