Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Salzano v. North Jersey Media Group Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 11, 2010No. A-78/79 September Term 2008Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Hoens

I concur in the majority’s conclusion that the time has come for us to reject the initial pleadings exception to the fair reporting privilege and I concur in the majority’s persuasive and thorough explanation of why that exception has no place in our jurisprudence. Moreover, I concur in the majority’s conclusion that once it has been determined that the fair reporting privilege applies, it becomes an absolute, rather than a qualified one.

I dissent, however, from the majority’s analysis of the application of the fair reporting privilege in this case because I cannot agree with the majority’s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Romaine v. KallingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  2. Ward v. ZelikovskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Harlan E. Orr v. The Argus-Press CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  4. Schiavone Construction Co. And Ronald A. Schiavone, Individually, in 86-5839 v. Time, Inc., in 86-5920Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Medico, Philip T. v. Time, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API