Legal Opinion
Bundy v. Cannon
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided May 26, 1971No. Civ. 70-486, 70-1363PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
In these cases, which have been consolidated for trial, 82 plaintiffs contend that the procedures under which they were transferred to the Maryland Penitentiary from the Sykesville Laundry Camp and the Maryland House of Correction and were kept in “segregated confinement” 1 and suffered other penalties, do not meet the due process standards guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 2
There are two principal suits: (1) Bundy et al. v. Cannon et al., filed in April 1970 by ten plaintiffs against (a) the Commissioner of the Division of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McNeese v. Board of Education for Community Unit School District 187 CahokiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- McKinnon v. PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Landman v. RoysterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Rhem v. MalcolmDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Norman C. Gray, Jr. v. J. Shane Creamer, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- McKINNON v. PATTERSONCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.