Legal Opinion

Philyaw v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1951No. 6 Div. 980PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARWOOD, Judge.

This appellant was originally convicted in the Recorder’s Court of the City of Birmingham of violating Section 847 (Malicious Mischief — Injury to Property) of the General City Code of the City of Birmingham.

From that conviction he perfected his appeal to the circuit court where he was again found guilty, and judgment was entered accordingly. •

Section 847 of the city code, supra, reads as follows:

“Sec. 847. Malicious mischief — Injury to property.
“Any person who unlawfully, wantonly, wilfully or maliciously disfigures, defaces, removes, destroys or injures any property of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Grattan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. City Council v. National Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Ragland v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  5. Morningstar v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marcus v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Worrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Du Bose v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Lee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  5. City of Decatur v. LindseyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API