Legal Opinion
Joseph R. Berger v. Board of Psychologist Examiners
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided October 28, 1975No. 74-1047PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacKINNON, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Joseph R. Berger, a practitioner of psychology in the District of Columbia since 1961, challenges the constitutionality of a 1971 law requiring that all psychologists practicing in the District be licensed and specifying that licenses shall be issued only to applicants possessed of certain academic credentials. Berger contends that the Due Process Clause of the Constitution guarantees him some alternative means of demonstrating his professional competence, in the nature of a “grandfather” concession to psychologists practicing at the time the licensure…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Parker v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Judith Abramson, Donald Airey v. Larry Gonzalez, as Secretary of the Florida Department of Professional RegulationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Sol Tabor v. Joint Board for the Enrollment of ActuariesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- New Jersey Education Ass'n v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- New Jersey Education Association v. Fred G. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.