Legal Opinion

McKinne v. Dickenson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney

The bill of complaint in this case, filed June 19th, 1886, by Dickenson and Taylor, appellees, alleges that on October 9th, 1SS3, E. K. Holliday, then living, was indebted to Dickenson and to Taylor, respectively, describing such debts.

That on such day, said Holliday was, as complainants are informed and believe, insolvent and indebted to a greater amount than the entire value of his visible property, and that he and McKinne, one of the appellants, fraudulently colluded, contrived and planned together to defraud,- embarrass, hinder and delay complainants, the appellees, and other of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holliday v. McKinneSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Sullivan v. MorenoSupreme Court of Florida · 1882
  3. Gibson v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1851
  4. Yonge v. McCormickSupreme Court of Florida · 1855
  5. Hayden v. ThrasherSupreme Court of Florida · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Godwin v. PhiferSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  2. Indian River Steamboat Co. v. East Coast Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
  3. Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Palms Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1923
  4. Lewter v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  5. Groff GMC Trucks, Inc. v. DriggersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API