Legal Opinion

Amit Tewari v. Alicia Casey

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided October 17, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01355Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 AMIT TEWARI, 7 Case No. 2:25-cv-01355-NJK Plaintiff, 8 v. [Docket No. 1] 9 ALICIA CASEY, 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, Defendant is proceeding in this action pro se and has 13 requested authority pursuant to § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. See Docket No. 1. Defendant 14 also filed a notice of removal. Docket No. 1-1. 15 I. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AUTHORITY 16 The Court first evaluates its authority to address the matter. The authority of the 17 undersigned magistrate judge is derived from 28 U.S.C. § 636, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Victor Washington v. Kilolo KijakaziCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API