Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. King
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the 'Court by
Judge Sampson
Affirming.
"When appellant, Louisville- & Nashville Railroad Company, sued S. L. King, drainage commissioner, in the Ohio circuit court, to recover $1,061.58, alleged to be due it under section 2380-13, Kentucky Statutes, as “ actual expenses incurred by the railroad company for opening its tracks,” to allow a floating dredge used in the construction of the drainage district to pass through the right of way, the drainage commissioner denied his liability for the claim, and by a second paragraph of his answer, in substance, pleaded that after institution of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ewell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Mason v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Savings Institution v. Chinn's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
- Raymond v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Renick v. RenickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Dwiggins v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Boone v. Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Ins. Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Harrel v. YontsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938