Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. King

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 1, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the 'Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming.

"When appellant, Louisville- & Nashville Railroad Company, sued S. L. King, drainage commissioner, in the Ohio circuit court, to recover $1,061.58, alleged to be due it under section 2380-13, Kentucky Statutes, as “ actual expenses incurred by the railroad company for opening its tracks,” to allow a floating dredge used in the construction of the drainage district to pass through the right of way, the drainage commissioner denied his liability for the claim, and by a second paragraph of his answer, in substance, pleaded that after institution of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ewell v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  2. Hall v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Mason v. CookCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Savings Institution v. Chinn's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
  5. Raymond v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renick v. RenickCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Dwiggins v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Boone v. Ohio Valley Fire & Marine Ins. Co.'s ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Harrel v. YontsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API