Legal Opinion
United States Steel Corp. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Republic Steel Corporation v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 10, 1979No. 78-1922, 78-1927PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before GODBOLD, Circuit Judge, SKELTON, * Senior Judge, and RUBIN, Circuit Judge. GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:
The EPA has petitioned for a rehearing on or clarification of the issue of application of the Emission Offset Ruling referred to in the last part of our original opinion. The petition must be granted to the following extent.
The Offset Ruling applies fairly stringent limitations on the construction of any new emissions source that would cause an NAAQS violation or exacerbate an existing one. As the EPA points out, application of the Ruling is on a case by case basis…
2Cited by37 opinions
- Chemical Manufacturers Association v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. 87-4849Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Service Employees International Union, Local 102 Probation Officers Association Roslinda Arellanes Teresa Ayala Renee U. Bonner v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Neil E. Goldschmidt, Secretary of the Department of Transportation, and Pan American Airways, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- American Transfer & Storage Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- City of Seabrook, Texas v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.