Legal Opinion

Cirrincione v. Johnson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1997No. 1—95—3386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

Sal Cirrincione (plaintiff) brought this action to recover $3,700 in damages from Michael Johnson (defendant), an attorney, representing the value of chiropractic services rendered to defendant’s injured client, Gil Johnson (Johnson). Following a jury trial, a verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $15,800, including punitive damages. Defendant argues on appeal that plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable cause of action pursuant to the Physicians Lien Act (the Act) (770 ILCS 80/01 (West 1994)) or alternative,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Aluma Systems, Inc. v. Frederick Quinn Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  4. United Cork Companies v. VollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Gaskill v. Robert E. Sanders Disposal HaulingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Wolf v. ToolieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  3. Dollieslager v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Dollieslager v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API