Cirrincione v. Johnson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE GREIMAN
delivered the opinion of the court:
Sal Cirrincione (plaintiff) brought this action to recover $3,700 in damages from Michael Johnson (defendant), an attorney, representing the value of chiropractic services rendered to defendant’s injured client, Gil Johnson (Johnson). Following a jury trial, a verdict was entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $15,800, including punitive damages. Defendant argues on appeal that plaintiff has failed to state a cognizable cause of action pursuant to the Physicians Lien Act (the Act) (770 ILCS 80/01 (West 1994)) or alternative,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cotton v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Aluma Systems, Inc. v. Frederick Quinn Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
- United Cork Companies v. VollandIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Gaskill v. Robert E. Sanders Disposal HaulingAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Wolf v. ToolieAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Dollieslager v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Cirrincione v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Dollieslager v. HurstAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998