Legal Opinion

Gaied v. New York State Tax Appeals Tribunal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 27, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtLahtinen, J.

*1493Tax Law § 605 (b) (1) (B) defines a resident individual as one “who is not domiciled in this state but maintains a permanent place of abode in this state and spends in the aggregate more than [183] days of the taxable year in this state.” Petitioner, who had a home in New Jersey during the relevant years, did not dispute that for those years he was present in New York at his business for more than 183 days. Accordingly, the issue distills to whether petitioner maintained a permanent place of abode in New York pursuant to the statute (see Tax Law § 605 [b] [1] [B]; see also 20 NYCRR 105.20 [e]…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suburban Restoration Co. v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. El-Tersli v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Kornblum v. Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Schibuk v. New York State Tax Appeals TribunalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. Evans v. Tax Appeals Tribunal of the State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API