Johnson v. Munger
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The only issue on appeal is whether there was sufficient compliance with the notice requirement of § 19.2 of the Little Rock City Code to allow a proposed initiated measure, Lifeline Electric Rates Ordinance, to be placed on the November 2, 1976, ballot. The chancellor held there was a substantial compliance with the publication requirements. However, the court felt constrained to hold the publication was insufficient because, when enforcement of election laws is sought befpre the election, a strict compliance is mandatory. Consequently, the measure should be removed from…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leigh v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Wheat v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1887
- Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Reeves v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
- Phillips v. RothrockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Vandiver v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Henderson v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979