Legal Opinion

Salvador Margiotta v. Railroad Retirement Board

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1983No. 82-4375PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

On this appeal from the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board, Salvador Margiotta, who now receives a disability annuity, contends that the Board incorrectly calculated the amount of the annuity. The issue is one of statutory interpretation. We affirm the Board’s reading of the Act.

Section 3(f)(3) of the Railroad Retirement Act, 45 U.S.C. § 231b(f)(3), contains the “social security minimum guaranty provision.” It says, in part, that:

If ... the annuity to which an individual is entitled under this subchapter ... together with the annuity, if any, of the spouse of such individual, is less…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Milan Cvikich v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API