Bowen v. Consolidated Mortgage & Investment Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Qtttt.t.tan, Judge.
It is permissible to grant a motion for summary judgment only where there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Malcom v. Malcolm, 112 Ga. App. 151, 154 (144 SE2d 188). Hence, the question we must determine in the case sub judice is whether any genuine issue as to usury was raised.
We recognize that: “A party may testify as to his intention. It is evidence to be considered, but the facts—all the facts—are *877to be considered, to arrive at the truth respecting his real motive.” Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 112…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hogg v. RuffnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Malcom v. MalcolmCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Benefield v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Childers v. Ackerman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hodges v. YoumansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Montgomery v. Pacific & Southern Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Clark v. Aaron's, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2012
- Resolute Insurance v. Norbo Trading Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Dews v. RatterreeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.