Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bushnell v. Ellis

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1961No. 561Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Clark,

with whom

Mr. Justice Frankfurter and Mr. Justice Harlan join, dissenting.

This application for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus was filed as an original action in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Neither the record, the briefs, nor argument of counsel indicates that such an action has ever been filed in a District Court of Texas as appears to be required by Texas procedure. See Ex parte Rod*419riguez, 169 Tex. Cr. R. _, 334 S. W. 2d 294 (1960); Ex parte Fitzpatrick, 167 Tex. Cr. R. 376, 320 S. W. 2d 683 (1959); Ex parte Brooks, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 397, 212 S. W. 956…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. Ex Parte FitzpatrickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Ex Parte BrooksCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API