Randy Dale Sixta, Appellant, vs. Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, Respondent
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
The phrase “adjudicated as a mental defective” as used in 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(4) (2024) includes individuals who have been adjudicated mentally ill and a danger to themselves or others.
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A25-0304 Randy Dale Sixta, Appellant, vs. Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, Respondent. Filed October 13, 2025 Affirmed Schmidt, Judge Concurring in part, dissenting in part, Connolly, Judge Lincoln County District Court File No. 41-CV-24-15 Zachary Webster, Birkholz & Associates, LLC, Mankato, Minnesota (for appellant) Keith Ellison, Attorney General, Madeleine DeMeules, Morgan Alexander, Assistant Attorneys General, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent) Considered and decided by Connolly, Presiding Judge; Schmidt, Judge; and Harris, Judge. SYLLABUS The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kisor v. WilkieSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.