Ligon v. Southside Cardiology Associates
Supreme Court of Virginia
1DissentJustice Lacy
Until today, Virginia, like virtually all other jurisdictions, recognized a distinction between evidence of one’s general habits and evidence of one’s specific habits and considered specific habit evidence relevant and admissible under certain conditions. 1 McCormick on Evidence § 195 (John William Strong ed., 4th ed. 1992); 1A Wigmore, Evidence § 93 (Tillers rev. 1983). Compare Cherry v. D.S. Nash Construction Co., 252 Va. 241, 475 S.E.2d 794 (1996), with Jackson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 179 Va. 642, 20 S.E.2d 489 (1942), Graham v. Commonwealth, 127 Va. 808, 103 S.E. 565 (1920),…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jackson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Roll 'R' Way Rinks, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Moore v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
- Spurlin, Administratrix v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
- Graham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.