Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ligon v. Southside Cardiology Associates

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 17, 1999No. Record 982467Published

1DissentJustice Lacy

Until today, Virginia, like virtually all other jurisdictions, recognized a distinction between evidence of one’s general habits and evidence of one’s specific habits and considered specific habit evidence relevant and admissible under certain conditions. 1 McCormick on Evidence § 195 (John William Strong ed., 4th ed. 1992); 1A Wigmore, Evidence § 93 (Tillers rev. 1983). Compare Cherry v. D.S. Nash Construction Co., 252 Va. 241, 475 S.E.2d 794 (1996), with Jackson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co., 179 Va. 642, 20 S.E.2d 489 (1942), Graham v. Commonwealth, 127 Va. 808, 103 S.E. 565 (1920),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  2. Roll 'R' Way Rinks, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  3. Moore v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888
  4. Spurlin, Administratrix v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  5. Graham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API