Legal Opinion

Loudon v. Carroll

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902No. Docket No. 55PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Grand-Traverse; Mayne, J. Assumpsit by William Loudon against Frederick N. Carroll to recover the price paid for land. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The defendant, being owner of some timbered lands, deeded them to the plaintiff for a consideration of some $2,000. Subsequently the plaintiff, who bought the land for the timber, claimed that in estimating the stumpage a mistake was made, whereby his estimator went upon a different tract, containing a greater amount of timber than the tract that he was looking for; that this mistake was due to wrong directions given to him by defendant’s foreman. He tendered back the deed and de*80manded the money paid, and this was refused. The plaintiff then commenced this case by attachment. His declaration…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. VollmarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Hallett v. GordonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Newton v. TollesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carbary v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API