Legal Opinion

State v. Teague

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 22, 1984No. AV-292PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

The State appeals an order granting ap-pellee’s motion to dismiss the charge against him of carrying a concealed firearm. We affirm.

The State first argues that since it filed a traverse to appellee’s motion to dismiss, alleging disputed material facts, the trial judge was obligated to deny the motion. State v. Huggins, 368 So.2d 119 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). However, contrary to the State’s contention, its traverse failed to controvert any specific material allegation of the motion to dismiss and, in fact, appel-lee accepted the facts alleged therein as correct. Thus, the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ensor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. State v. HugginsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  3. State v. HollidayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. State v. HankersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TeagueSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. State v. LanierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API