Legal Opinion

People v. Sundstrom

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1981No. 81CA0287PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COYTE, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the denial of his Crim.P. 35(c) motion for reduction of sentence. We affirm.

Defendant sought reduction of his sentence pursuant to Crim.P. 35(c) claiming that the decision in Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F.Supp. 122 (D.Colo.1979), modified, 639 F.2d 559 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041, 101 S.Ct. 1759, 68 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981) which determined that conditions at the prison constituted cruel and unusual punishment, made his sentence more onerous than contemplated by the sentencing judge. The reviewing court denied the motion, finding that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  2. Ramos v. LammDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1980
  3. Carl E. Cook v. Jack A. Hanberry, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. Konigsberg v. CicconeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
  5. Spann v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. People v. BuschColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. BuschColorado Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API