Legal Opinion
Powe v. Ennis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 16, 1999No. 98-40234PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Per curiam
Robert Powe appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. 1 He contends that the district court erred in dismissing, without prejudice, his failure-to-protect claim and conspiracy claim for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Joining the other circuits that have explicitly addressed this issue, we proceed by reviewing the dismissal de novo. See Alexander v. Hawk, 159 F.3d 1321, 1323 (11th Cir.1998); Jenkins v. Morton, 148 F.3d 257, 259 (3d Cir.1998); White v. McGinnis, 131 F.3d 593, 595 (6th Cir.1997); Garrett v. Hawk, 127 F.3d 1263, 1264…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alexander v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Underwood v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Garrett v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Wendell v. AsherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Robert Small v. WhittickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Dillon v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Peter Lewis v. Odie Washington, Director, Illinois Department of Corrections, Mary Nichols, Richard Gramley, Lieutenant Shaw, and Lieutenant JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Paul Shifflett v. Mr. KorszniakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Carbe v. LappinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.