Legal Opinion

Dash v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1934No. 2459PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HORNBECK, PJ. •

We have been favored with the opinions of the- trial court on sustaining the demurrers, and in support of the action of the trial court we are cited to the following cases:

Agricultural Society v Grenner, 122 Oh St, 560;

Lindemann v Eyrich, 21 Oh Ap, 314; (4 Abs 645).

Goebel v Hummel, 21 Oh Ap 486 (4 Abs 376);

Morris v Woodburn, 57 Oh St, 330;

Village v Gilbow et, 81 Oh St, 263.

We are also referred to certain other cases outside of Ohio and certain nisi prius opinions in Ohio. Our attention is particularly directed to a recent opinion by the Appellate Court of the Seventh…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago City v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  2. City of Rochester v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Jaquith v. WordenWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. McDonald v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Chicago Great Western R. v. HulbertCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudson v. Ohio Bus Line Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Tishler v. Taxicabs of Cincinnati, Inc., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API