Weingarten v. Block
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR, P. J.
The major questions presented by this appeal 1 are whether the trial court properly: 1) found that plaintiff, Saul M. Weingarten (Weingarten), the former City Attorney of Seaside and local attorney for its redevelopment agency, was a “public official” and “public figure” within the rule of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 [11 L.Ed.2d 686, 84 S.Ct. 710, 95 A.L.R.2d 1412], and Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967) 388 U.S. 130 [18 L.Ed.2d 1094, 87 S.Ct. 1975]; 2) granted a nonsuit at the conclusion of Weingarten’s evidence before a jury on his complaint for…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Khawar v. Globe International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
- Gomes v. FriedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Joseph v. Daily News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- City of Stanton v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.