Legal Opinion

Weingarten v. Block

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 14, 1980No. Civ. 42705PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, P. J.

The major questions presented by this appeal 1 are whether the trial court properly: 1) found that plaintiff, Saul M. Weingarten (Weingarten), the former City Attorney of Seaside and local attorney for its redevelopment agency, was a “public official” and “public figure” within the rule of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) 376 U.S. 254 [11 L.Ed.2d 686, 84 S.Ct. 710, 95 A.L.R.2d 1412], and Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967) 388 U.S. 130 [18 L.Ed.2d 1094, 87 S.Ct. 1975]; 2) granted a nonsuit at the conclusion of Weingarten’s evidence before a jury on his complaint for…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Taus v. LoftusCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Khawar v. Globe International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gomes v. FriedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Joseph v. Daily News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
  5. City of Stanton v. CoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API