MATTER OF CASS v. Krakower
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Election Law §§ 6-164 and 6-166 collectively require that an opportunity to ballot petition shall set forth the names of persons constituting a “committee to receive notices” and that “[a]ll required notices shall be served on the members of the committee named in the petition.” Here, petitioner, the aggrieved candidate, failed to serve or provide any notice of the present proceeding to the Committee to Receive Notices. Thus, the Appellate Division properly reversed Supreme Court’s denial of respondent’s motion to dismiss (65 AD3d 637 [2009]).
Accordingly, the order of the…
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fasoldt v. BugbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Cassar v. LarsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cassar v. LarsenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- MATTER OF FASOLDT v. BugbeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- MATTER OF MYERS v. BaisleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2009