Legal Opinion

Heitler v. Glucksman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In two related proceedings, inter alia, for custody and visitation pursuant to *867Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from (1) an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Turbow, J.), dated February 20, 2002, which, upon his default in appearing at the hearing, awarded sole custody of the parties’ child to the mother and limited his visitation to supervised visitation, and (2) an order of the same court, also dated February 20, 2002, which awarded the mother an order of protection compelling him to stay away from her and the child except in connection with the court-ordered visitation.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Rose W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. In re Zagary George Bayne G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Mitchell v. MorrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Bailen v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kondratyeva v. YapiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Bouie v. Arvelo-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Davy v. DavyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. In re Dale K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API