Legal Opinion

Hambleton v. Selden Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1948No. Appeal, 172PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

Plaintiffs are real estate brokers. This action was brought to recover a commission of 5% on $20,000, with interest, as compensation for procuring a purchaser for defendants’ land, in accordance with an alleged sales agreement entered into by them with plaintiffs. Defendants repudiated the sale made by plaintiffs on their behalf and sold the land through another broker for $21,000. The jury found for the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,072. Defendants’ motions for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were refused and judgment was entered on the verdict.

No writing passed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Philadelphia Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Schamberg v. KahnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Berry v. Eastman Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Rick v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Jacobs v. McKelveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Malta v. Houck, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API