Legal Opinion

State v. Gardner

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 11, 1999No. 98-2655-CRPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

David J. Gardner appeals from his conviction for armed burglary, false imprisonment while armed and second-degree sexual assault, claiming that the trial court erred in not allowing his expert to testify about his prescription medication's effect on his ability to distinguish right from wrong. We agree with Gardner that the involuntary intoxication defense is available when the intoxication was due to prescription medication taken as directed. However, our review of Gardner's offer of proof leads us to affirm the trial court's exclusion of the proffered testimony — Gardner's expert failed to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Elias v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Steele v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. State v. EdmistenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. State v. Donyil L. Anderson, Sr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API