Legal Opinion

Spooner v. Spooner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1918No. 896PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Temporary alimony, etc. Before Judge Harrell. Decatur superior court. January 5, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

1. While a person is temporarily non compos mentis he is not authorized to maintain a suit in his own name. Thomas v. Thomas, 145 Ga. Ill (88 S. E. 584). But where, though very weak in mind, he has enough -capacity to understand the nature of a particular cause of action, and will enough to desire to bring a suit thereon, he may do so without a next friend or guardian. Calhoun v. Moseley, 114 Ga. 641 (40 S. E. 714).(a) On conflicting evidence the judge was authorized to hold that the plaintiff had sufficient mental capacity to institute and prosecute her suit for temporary alimony without a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Calhoun v. MosleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Thomas v. ThomasSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parrish v. RigellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Boyd v. EdwardsOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Akin v. AkinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. Huley v. HuleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Spooner v. SpoonerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API